More than half of international graduate students and postdoctoral fellows currently studying in the US say they would have chosen not to enrol in the first place if access to H-1B work visas were determined by wage levels. According to a survey conducted by the Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, 53% of respondents indicated they would not have come to the US under a wage-based H-1B allocation system.
The survey, which polled 1,039 current F-1 and J-1 visa holders across a range of institutions, highlights the central role of post-study work pathways in student decision-making. The results also point to potential risks for the US research and innovation ecosystem if proposed H-1B policy changes are implemented.
H-1B visa changes could reshape graduate and postdoc plans
Among the current student respondents, 36% reported they would “definitely” try to stay in the US after their studies, and 28% said they would “probably” try. However, when asked how their plans might change under a wage-prioritised H-1B system, many reconsidered.
• 48% of master's students who were initially planning to stay said they would not do so under a wage-based system.
• 52% of PhD students currently planning to stay reported they would change their decision.
• 38% of postdoctoral fellows said they would no longer try to stay if H-1Bs were allocated by wage levels.
These figures suggest that H-1B wage-level changes could significantly reduce the retention of US-trained international researchers.
Impact of wage-based H-1B allocation on students intending to stay in the US
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students , prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Employers confirm student dependency on H-1B pipeline
A companion H-1B Employer Survey, conducted in the same period, gathered responses from 75 employers across various sectors. Of the cap-subject employers, 63% said at least half of their initial H-1B petitions were on behalf of international students at US universities.
For cap-exempt employers, such as higher education institutions, 56% reported similar reliance on F-1 graduates.
Employer reliance on US international graduates for H-1B roles
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students, prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Furthermore, a large portion of these applications are filed at entry-level wage classifications. Among cap-subject employers, 46% said that at least one-quarter of their petitions for international students were at Wage Level 1. For petitions on behalf of workers with US advanced degrees, 41% of respondents reported using Level 1 wages in at least a quarter of cases.
Prospective students also deterred by H-1B wage rules
In a related Prospective Students Survey of 611 potential applicants, 6% fewer respondents said they would enrol in US programmes if H-1Bs were awarded by wage level. The effect was more pronounced among those considering bachelor’s and master’s degrees, where 7% reported they would be likely not to enrol under the proposed system. Among prospective PhD students, the deterrent was 2%.
Change in likelihood to enrol under wage-based H-1B system
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students, prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Survey sample skews toward STEM, PhDs, and large institutions
Of the 1,039 respondents in the Current Students Survey, 49% were PhD candidates, and 26% were postdoctoral researchers. A significant number came from STEM fields: 35% were in physical or natural sciences, 19% in biological and biomedical sciences, and 16% in engineering.
Respondents were enrolled across diverse institutional types, with 27% from private and 73% from public universities. Institutional sizes were reported as 7% small, 38% medium, and 55% large.
The survey, which polled 1,039 current F-1 and J-1 visa holders across a range of institutions, highlights the central role of post-study work pathways in student decision-making. The results also point to potential risks for the US research and innovation ecosystem if proposed H-1B policy changes are implemented.
H-1B visa changes could reshape graduate and postdoc plans
Among the current student respondents, 36% reported they would “definitely” try to stay in the US after their studies, and 28% said they would “probably” try. However, when asked how their plans might change under a wage-prioritised H-1B system, many reconsidered.
• 48% of master's students who were initially planning to stay said they would not do so under a wage-based system.
• 52% of PhD students currently planning to stay reported they would change their decision.
• 38% of postdoctoral fellows said they would no longer try to stay if H-1Bs were allocated by wage levels.
These figures suggest that H-1B wage-level changes could significantly reduce the retention of US-trained international researchers.
Impact of wage-based H-1B allocation on students intending to stay in the US
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students , prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Employers confirm student dependency on H-1B pipeline
A companion H-1B Employer Survey, conducted in the same period, gathered responses from 75 employers across various sectors. Of the cap-subject employers, 63% said at least half of their initial H-1B petitions were on behalf of international students at US universities.
For cap-exempt employers, such as higher education institutions, 56% reported similar reliance on F-1 graduates.
Employer reliance on US international graduates for H-1B roles
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students, prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Furthermore, a large portion of these applications are filed at entry-level wage classifications. Among cap-subject employers, 46% said that at least one-quarter of their petitions for international students were at Wage Level 1. For petitions on behalf of workers with US advanced degrees, 41% of respondents reported using Level 1 wages in at least a quarter of cases.
Prospective students also deterred by H-1B wage rules
In a related Prospective Students Survey of 611 potential applicants, 6% fewer respondents said they would enrol in US programmes if H-1Bs were awarded by wage level. The effect was more pronounced among those considering bachelor’s and master’s degrees, where 7% reported they would be likely not to enrol under the proposed system. Among prospective PhD students, the deterrent was 2%.
Change in likelihood to enrol under wage-based H-1B system
Source: Institute for Progress and NAFSA: Association of International Educators, as reported in their August–September 2025 survey of international students, prospective students, and H-1B employers.
Survey sample skews toward STEM, PhDs, and large institutions
Of the 1,039 respondents in the Current Students Survey, 49% were PhD candidates, and 26% were postdoctoral researchers. A significant number came from STEM fields: 35% were in physical or natural sciences, 19% in biological and biomedical sciences, and 16% in engineering.
Respondents were enrolled across diverse institutional types, with 27% from private and 73% from public universities. Institutional sizes were reported as 7% small, 38% medium, and 55% large.
You may also like
Terror survivors' powerful message after Manchester synagogue attack
Robbie Williams issues apology as he's forced to cancel huge show amid terror worries
Mizoram: Thousands gather in Darlawn for 27th Salvation Army Youth Congress
Britain's future depends on securing our borders and here is how we do it
Rugby team sent 'terrorist threat' as police respond after play-off clash
