The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea filed by HDFC Bank Managing Director and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan seeking to quash an FIR registered against him. The court observed that the matter is already scheduled to be heard by the Bombay High Court on July 14.
A bench headed by Justice PS Narsimha refused to stay the proceedings initiated in connection with allegations of financial irregularities involving the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, which manages Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Jagdishan, submitted that “the bank has been roped in a private dispute. The idea is to summon him to the police station. It will create havoc for the bank. It is affecting my personal reputation.”
Responding to the submission, the bench said, “We will not apply our mind on the merits. The case is listed on the 14th July. We hope it will be taken up on that day.”
Jagdishan approached the top court after an FIR was lodged, citing his alleged role in the financial dealings related to the Trust. The Supreme Court, however, decided not to intervene and allowed the Bombay High Court to take its course.
However, the court observed that it sympathises with him (as the matter could not be heard due to recusal by the three HC benches. “It is unfortunate,” the judge further said.
A bench headed by Justice PS Narsimha refused to stay the proceedings initiated in connection with allegations of financial irregularities involving the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, which manages Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Jagdishan, submitted that “the bank has been roped in a private dispute. The idea is to summon him to the police station. It will create havoc for the bank. It is affecting my personal reputation.”
Responding to the submission, the bench said, “We will not apply our mind on the merits. The case is listed on the 14th July. We hope it will be taken up on that day.”
Jagdishan approached the top court after an FIR was lodged, citing his alleged role in the financial dealings related to the Trust. The Supreme Court, however, decided not to intervene and allowed the Bombay High Court to take its course.
However, the court observed that it sympathises with him (as the matter could not be heard due to recusal by the three HC benches. “It is unfortunate,” the judge further said.
You may also like
Sanjay Bhandari declared fugitive economic offender: Delhi court tags arms dealer linked to Robert Vadra case; extradition path eases
Rachel Reeves has had a week from hell - but the real meltdown starts NOW
This college is not 50, 100, but 178 years old, the first choice of JEE toppers with placements worth crores.
Coach of top Wimbledon star says 'I put a finger up my a**' in concerning statement
South Korea: Ex-President Yoon appears for 2nd questioning by special counsel
